![]() These table shows currently tested systems on Some operating system have problems running with different storage The details of the change are also available on Open Source Firmware Release 4.10 Signing Key. V4.11.0.1 and v4.0.30 firmware releases are signed by PC Engines For the details of the change please refer toįollowing new coreboot release 4.11, a new PC Engines Open Sourceįirmware Release 4.10 Signing Key has been enrolled. Release binaries one may find an asciinema record showing exampleįirmware signature verification using appropriate key. Responsible for maintaining PC Engines firmware. The keys are maintained and managed by 3mdeb company Legacy releases starting from v4.0.28 areīeing signed with PC Engines Open Source Firmware Release 4.10 4.9.0.x releases are signed by 4.9 Signing Key and 4.10.0.xīy 4.10 Signing Key). Release Signing Key adequate to the official coreboot release Release notes describing changes, fixes and known issues inĮach binary (or archive in case of older images) isĬryptographically signed by PC Engines Open Source Firmware Please help us understand how we canīetter serve the open-source firmware community and ensure its success in the Your input is important to us, and we would We are considering a subscription model to ensure stableĪnd reliable firmware updates. Our focus will be on releases and feature sets drivenīy community support. Legacy of PC Engines by distributing open-source firmware and putting theĬommunity's needs first. Significant change for the open-source firmware community, our commitment to Has discontinued its sponsorship for open-source firmware. Servers for network security, wireless networking, and embedded applications, We regret to announce that PC Engines, a provider of small and low-power :1 Uncaught (in promise) CloudError: Endpoint (`deleteHighlight`) responded with an error (or the request failed).Open-source firmware sponsorship announcement ![]() Delete buttons not responding.įailed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 500 (Internal Server Error) I have tried the free public cast version. I can change the script later thats not a big NO for me. I am not a native english speaker but transkript is not that good. Perhaps long term there's no good way to deal with any of this.?īutton in IDE to record audio note, and have it stored under. ticket trackers change - a reference to Trello card GKO-826 does no good when the project moved off Trello 2 years ago. most of the time if I embed comments like that, someone blocks a PR or just rips them out in the name of "cleanliness", then 3 years later people are wondering "why was this done this way?" Links to tickets can help, but. OFTEN I want some form of "stream of consciousness" thoughts associated with code - "spoke with Titus and Jen about this, and the loop needs to be broken up because foobar.". Perhaps some metadata format for comments could be defined and IDE plugins could make fetch the media. even now, we end up, sometimes, writing comments in pull requests which may correspond to particular lines in particular files, but we can't easily connect anything else. I had 0 idea about how to build something like that, but it seemed useful. svn was the thing at the time, and eclipse and netbeans were the dominant players. 15 years ago, I had an idea for allowing embedding of multimedia files with commits. Now I consider documentation good or bad based on if it contains all 4 kinds of documentation.Ībout. ![]() ![]() There isn't just good documentation and bad documentation, there are 4 different kinds of documentation for distinct types of information delivery: Tutorials, How-To Guides, Explanations, and finally Reference. My eyes were opened when I read something that I have since committed to memory: Bad documentation: I can't find what I'm looking for Good documentation: I can find what I'm looking forĢ. I used to think projects that claimed to be documented either fit into two groups:ġ. I would either have to block out some time to learn it all or go with a completely different solution. Other times, I would find documentation and struggle to follow it in practice until I came to the conclusion that I would need to read the whole thing in its entirety to become productive. I only needed information on that one little thing to be productive, but I'd get stuck reading someone's entire backstory, trying to skim and find the one useful line in a random example to help me. Sometimes I would know enough about a topic except for one little thing and would look to the documentation. There's a lot that is mistakenly conflated as "documentation". TL DR The Grand Unified Theory of Documentation: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |