![]() ![]() The laser beam is split/expanded because the lens is removed illuminating both object and film plate. Direction of light is not at a angle but straight on in a transmission hologram. Light hits object 1st then the film plate. ![]() Object is behind film plate.Ī transmission hologram is different. Light source comes from an angle from above and goes through film plate 1st. I am not a expert in holography, but with the equipment I am using a reflection hologram requires the object being replicated extremely close to film plate. Good afternoon Hugh but for me it is morning I recommend that anyone interested buys one on ebay and compares it. Such ‘forensic evidence’ as we have, abundantly provided by the STuRP team, clearly demonstrates that the Shroud cannot be a hologram of any kind. Dave is hopelessly confused as to how a hologram is made, and none of his statements is true. A hologram made by a split beam and opaque film does not require the object to be as close as 5cm. A hologram made using a single light source and transparent film works best if the object is very close to the film. If the Shroud image demonstrates such attenuation, then it is definitely not due to light. This requires a transparent film, which the Shroud is not.Ħ) “Both images fade and or vanish when tilted to the far right or far left.” The Shroud does no such thing.ħ) Any monochrome picture is ‘single colour.’Ĩ) “Both images involve subject close to film plate to capture image (past 5cm there is no image formation on a reflection hologram) (I know because I tried it).” If the Shroud was created by light emanating from a body, then it would not be attenuated to zero over 5cm. One way of making a hologram is to have a single source, and the interference pattern is created by the reflection from the object coming back in the other direction. It may be referring to the Shroud as a result of collimated radiation from a dead body, in which case the light rays would be parallel, but a a hologram relies on light coming from two directions in order to create an interference pattern, which is what a hologram is. The image of a hologram is captured in emulsion about 8000nm thick.Ģ) Almost any picture has ‘good resolution.’ģ) The 3D quality of the Shroud is qualitatively different from the 3D quality of a hologram, which does not record any information about distance by means of image intensity.Ĥ) Very few pictures can be seen from the back side.ĥ) “Both have light coming from only 1 direction to form image.” If this statement means anything, it is untrue. Of his first 8 similarities, some apply to any photograph, some are irrelevant to holography, and some are simply untrue.ġ) The image on the Shroud is perhaps 20nm thick. “I’m willing to hear more from Dave and anyone else,” says Dan. Almost nothing of Dave’s video or his comments above shows any knowledge of either the Shroud or holography, and some of it is simply untrue. “I can affirm without fear of being proven wrong … ” Ho ho. ![]() I’m willing to hear more from Dave and anyone else. Resurrection and I think some of these “match points” with the shroud are little more than some so-whats. I don’t see how any of this matches the Gospel accounts of the What is presented in this video not only matches the Gospel account of the resurrection of Jesus it also matches the forensic evidence on the Shroud of Turin. There is no other logical alternative image theory explanation that matches the gospel account or the forensic evidence. As highly improbable as that may sound that is what the forensic evidence says happened. "I can affirm without fear of being proven wrong The Shroud of Turin image was created by a interference pattern of laser like light that emitted from the body of Jesus" Shroud of Turin is a linen holographic film plate. Both images involve subject close to film plate to capture image (past 5cm there is no image formation on a reflection hologram) (I know because I tried it) Both images fade and or vanish when tilted to the far right or far leftĨ. Both have light coming from only 1 direction to form imageĦ. Both images cannot be seen from the back sideĥ. Both images are extremely superficial, thin depth image (1/50th thickness of human hair)Ĥ. Shroud Image and Hologram Image Match Pointsġ. I am very close to being able record a interference pattern on linen that would match many of the Shroud image characteristics. … Here is a video of my latest research project. In a comment to another posting, Dave Hines tips us off to a new video he has produced. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |